Author Topic: Current MvA Win/Loss stats (Read 23677 times)

Lightning Blue · April 04, 2005, 03:14:27 PM

From March 15th until today.

Click here!

Discuss?

Fewlio · April 04, 2005, 03:19:02 PM

This looks good to me, because it's not nearly as close to the 1.x alien rapeage

. Aliens should do better in a "pub environment" due to the different skills of commanders and ability of marines to work as a team. The hera statistics are disappointing though.

LowCrawler · April 04, 2005, 03:19:03 PM

aliens>marines

seriously though this is alot worse than i thought it was... holy crap. Hopefully 3.02 will help

Mr.Bill · April 04, 2005, 03:19:23 PM

we still need a average player count damn it!

GrayDuck · April 04, 2005, 03:21:48 PM

Maybe clear out the stats and see what this new update does.

pardzh · April 04, 2005, 03:22:10 PM

Hera and Veil both surprised me. Only two maps I can ever seem to comm to a win. :blink:

Niteowl · April 04, 2005, 03:32:18 PM

More Number Crunching for you viewing pleasure!

AzubahF · April 04, 2005, 03:33:19 PM

pretty sad if you ask me

fatty · April 04, 2005, 03:50:59 PM

there is clearly an inverse relationship between Fatty World of Warcraft Playing Time and Number of Marine Wins On Lunixmonster.

Niteowl · April 04, 2005, 04:03:18 PM

MORE PICTARS!

tankefugl (in a tent) · April 04, 2005, 04:12:44 PM

It'd be more interesting to view alien wins as a function of time since release.

It'll also be interesting to see the alien winratio after 3.02.

Necrosis · April 04, 2005, 04:41:43 PM

According to the pretty chart, percentages stack for aliens pretty uniformly.

Everything would need to be wiped to take into account 3.02, and also take into account the growing popularity of the Elec strat. Further still, I suggest restricting the sample to games when there's 60% or more reg players, in order to rule out poor play.

2_of_8 · April 04, 2005, 05:06:02 PM

Quote

Further still, I suggest restricting the sample to games when there's 60% or more reg players, in order to rule out poor play.
[snapback]45378[/snapback]

I like that.
Bad aliens vs bad marines = alien win, probably.
Good aliens vs good marines = that's what the game is about.

Isamil · April 04, 2005, 05:29:50 PM

Keep in mind the results aren't very valid, you need to get rid of games 5 vs 5 or below.

duherman · April 04, 2005, 05:36:51 PM

5 vs 5 = aliens win

2_of_8 · April 04, 2005, 05:49:17 PM

Quote

5 vs 5 = aliens win
[snapback]45398[/snapback]

As with 6vs6, quite likely. They say it's balanced for 6vs6 - yeah, that's when Marines have aimbot-level aim.

SlickWill · April 04, 2005, 05:55:22 PM

Honestly didn't think it was that bad. Makes me not feel so bad for my comming win/loss percentage. It is certainly better than that average. Sure, aliens are supposed to win, but that is a bit much. 35/65 or 40/60 is a healthy alien domination, not 13/87.

2_of_8 · April 04, 2005, 05:56:47 PM

If a comm can win on hera, then it's a good comm

Manta · April 04, 2005, 06:02:48 PM

XD

Look at the ayumi stats. I mean, I know ayumi sucks, but jeez.

LowCrawler · April 04, 2005, 06:31:48 PM

Quote

Honestly didn't think it was that bad. Makes me not feel so bad for my comming win/loss percentage. It is certainly better than that average. Sure, aliens are supposed to win, but that is a bit much. 35/65 or 40/60 is a healthy alien domination, not 13/87.
[snapback]45408[/snapback]

should be more like 13/37 imo.