http://www.stopjohn.com/movies/powmia-affair.htm
[snapback]26630[/snapback]
These aren't verbatim because I can't be bothered to watch that again.
"John Kerry betrayed the POW/MIAs"
And betraying our country is better?
"John Kerry's committe had no conclusive reports about POWs still being held."
Bush didn't have any real reports about WMDs either.
As for you, Krunk/Uzi, my old nemesis on these matters, your 're-retort' had THREE religious references in the first two sentences alone. Religion has absolutely NOTHING to do with politics. George Washington. Thomas Jefferson. Benjamin Franklin. John Adams, and Abe Lincoln. Guess what they all have in common? They weren't christians, and most were athiests. And surprisingly, I don't see George W. Senior on the list of the nation's greatest presidents. They saw firsthand what religion does to government, and surprisingly, they're the ones who made our country. Now we're back where biblethumping hicks like you vote Bush because he preaches good christian values. If you can't wrap your feeble mind around that concept, you have no business even living in America where speration of church and state is in our first amendment. I suggest going back to Afghanistan - maybe living under a religious regime is good for you? Maybe the Taliban will let you fight for them.
Why do people oppose :p marriage? Because the bible say gays are an attrocity, and god smote the cities of Sodom and Gamorrah for it. You grow up with religion beat into your skull and you've got someone else doing all your thinking for you.
George Bush: "No, I don't know that athiests should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered as patriots. This is one nation under god."
John Adams to Thomas Jefferson: "This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it."
[snapback]26711[/snapback]
I could solve the whole :p issue with 1 move.
"remove marriage from the government"
There I solved that issue rather quickly. And yes this is one nation under god.
I don't preach good christian values. I posted a link from an author who is well respected in both conservative and liberal thinktanks. I don't see why you dock him because of his religous beliefs, It seems to me if anyone cares about religous freedom it would be the liberals. I mean they are the ones after all who want headscarfs on womans head when taking a picture for a driver's license.
Jefferson was but one person in the drafting the constitution. But I don't understand how it only applies to christians, how come is it that exceptions like in California are made for those of other religions?