81
Off Topic / Russian Climbing
« on: January 17, 2006, 08:45:30 AM »
Yeah, that was something. You would have to have some balls to do some of those things, definitely.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
83
Off Topic / Hey it's 2006!
« on: January 05, 2006, 07:08:00 AM »
Yay, it's 2006. This number doesn't sound that cool. Anyway, I decided to try harder in college. That is my only resolution. And when I am not doing that, I agree with Foolio -- more drinking.
84
Quote
Yeah, I heard that too. But you have to see before you know anything for certain. But SC:Ghost still delays SC2 no matter how you look at it since they have to work on it somewhat.QuoteYeah, I will personally kick Blizzard's ass if they port WoW to 360. They already screwed us out of a Starcraft 2 with Starcraft: Ghost which hasn't even ****ing came out.... Console and Blizzard shouldn't go together.I heard Diablo 3 is before Starcraft 2, doesn't matter though since Starcraft 2 will suck =3.[snapback]54626[/snapback][snapback]54638[/snapback]
P.S. Starcraft is hot.
86
Off Topic / This year's harvest
« on: December 29, 2005, 08:55:15 AM »
$105, a sexy new electric shaver (self-cleaning ftw), some suede picture frame, candy, and something from my dad (which I will get today). Not that big of one this year, but, I didn't ask for anything and was busy at college before.
89
General / So who's left?
« on: December 20, 2005, 03:52:54 PM »
I still check the forums (obviously). I am just waiting around to see what pops up.
92
Off Topic / PC tech question
« on: December 04, 2005, 01:52:40 AM »
If I remember correctly (and I might not since I had a bit to drink), your RAM will run at the lowest speed. So, your 3200 will run at 2700...same for the MHz...............
93
Off Topic / Hello all how you all doing?
« on: December 01, 2005, 07:30:04 PM »Quote
What makes you think UT2k7 will be godly? I mean, UT2k4 was not bad. In fact, it was good. But nobody bought it anyway, because nobody ever buys UT. What makes 2k7 different?UT2004 was a very good game, and I had lots of fun playing it (although I didn't much since I used my friend's copy). We played it on LANs a lot, and I am sure I could get a ton of people to play it in my dorm. And UT2007 looks so beautiful, and it has to be better than UT2004. They are leaving in the same modes, but making it play more like the original UT. The art style looks so nice in it too. There is technically no reason it shouldn't be better than UT2004.[snapback]54411[/snapback]
EDIT: I also got to play UT2004 online several times. It was a blast, and there were plenty of servers. I also played UT2003 online for almost a year. IMO, there is no shortage of people who are buying it since I have never had a problem finding good servers.
96
General / NS 3.1 out tomorrow
« on: December 01, 2005, 07:22:55 PM »
I prefer 15/17 NS, so I will even out the teams and it'll be awesome.
97
General / NS 3.1 out tomorrow
« on: November 29, 2005, 05:20:27 PM »Quote
<3QuoteI tried playing 3.1 the day after it came out, but the server was empty. I haven't tried since.I love you malev.[snapback]54372[/snapback][snapback]54375[/snapback]
98
Off Topic / Hello all how you all doing?
« on: November 29, 2005, 05:19:12 PM »
The only problem is, every next gen system will be out. The godly UT2007 will also be out. And there will be a video card that has 1 gig of RAM and run at 1.5GHz, and I will want it to play UT2007 on the Super, Ultra-Sexy, Consume-Your-Computer's-Soul Video Setting. And the WoW expansion will be out.