Show Posts
1
Off Topic / NationStates: what should I pick for this issue?
« on: February 02, 2005, 08:07:21 PM »
Ok so here's the issue I got today. I'm looking for suggestions on what I should pick.
---
TANL Decides:
When tentacle monsters attack!
The Issue:
After several reports of pet tentacle monsters violently attacking, injuring, and even killing citizens, there has been growing pressure from public safety activists for the government to take action.
The Debate
1. "These creatures are a danger to the public and must be destroyed!" says Randy Hanover, representative of the Public Institution for Social Safety, Equality, and Direction. "I was attacked by one just on the way here and I nearly lost my life! They're a public menace. We must shoot and burn them!"
2. "Why punish the poor things?" asks animal-lover Beth Mombota, covered in scars from previous encounters with tentacle monsters. "All they need is good hands to care and rehabilitate them. We need a government education programme to tame them and turn them into loveable pets. The one I'm holding right now shows that it can be done. They are all good, kind creatures deep d- argh!"
3. "I agree that we shouldn't kill them," says Beth Barry, a famous lawyer. "But I don't think the owner should get away with breaking the law! This is clearly a case of 'intent to greviously harm' if I ever saw it. All citizens should be held accountable of their pet's actions as if they had done the act themselves. It's the only way to be fair - after all, they're just dumb animals."
4. "Who cares!?" screams Calvin Hendrikson as he sends out his pirate radio station broadcast. "Just repeal any laws preventing us from shooting the things when they attack and we'll be able to save ourselves without this stupid, authoritarian, overbearing government and legal system wasting our tax money!"
---
TANL Decides:
When tentacle monsters attack!
The Issue:
After several reports of pet tentacle monsters violently attacking, injuring, and even killing citizens, there has been growing pressure from public safety activists for the government to take action.
The Debate
1. "These creatures are a danger to the public and must be destroyed!" says Randy Hanover, representative of the Public Institution for Social Safety, Equality, and Direction. "I was attacked by one just on the way here and I nearly lost my life! They're a public menace. We must shoot and burn them!"
2. "Why punish the poor things?" asks animal-lover Beth Mombota, covered in scars from previous encounters with tentacle monsters. "All they need is good hands to care and rehabilitate them. We need a government education programme to tame them and turn them into loveable pets. The one I'm holding right now shows that it can be done. They are all good, kind creatures deep d- argh!"
3. "I agree that we shouldn't kill them," says Beth Barry, a famous lawyer. "But I don't think the owner should get away with breaking the law! This is clearly a case of 'intent to greviously harm' if I ever saw it. All citizens should be held accountable of their pet's actions as if they had done the act themselves. It's the only way to be fair - after all, they're just dumb animals."
4. "Who cares!?" screams Calvin Hendrikson as he sends out his pirate radio station broadcast. "Just repeal any laws preventing us from shooting the things when they attack and we'll be able to save ourselves without this stupid, authoritarian, overbearing government and legal system wasting our tax money!"