Overly Chatty Penguins

The Ready Room => Off Topic => Topic started by: LowCrawler on June 16, 2005, 09:26:06 PM

Title: Batman
Post by: LowCrawler on June 16, 2005, 09:26:06 PM
I just saw it and thought it kicked ass.

I cant wait to see IMAX version...

what about the rest of you's guy's
Title: Batman
Post by: Wolfwood on June 17, 2005, 07:35:48 AM
My sister saw it in IMAX and said it was good... but my girlfriend absolutely hates Katie Holmes, so, I won't be seeing this one in theaters

 >_<  >_<  >_<
Title: Batman
Post by: Dubbilex on June 17, 2005, 08:26:44 AM
I daresay that it was super-good.  

The fights were good - cool and brawly rather than all kung fu, as Batman's ninja training would suggest it should be but I digress - there wasn't much buildup to the ending (I found myself, watching the final fight, a little surprised when I all of a sudden discovered that I was actually watching the final fight.)

Batman's voice is pretty lamesauce and a little overdone, and he has no cool catchphrases.  And in a realistic setting his mask just looks silly (the rest of the costume was preeeetttty awesome)

Last, I would have preferred to see an R-rated movie, if for nothing else, for the sake of seeing Katie Holmes naked and maybe a bit more violence.



Overall, it's worth it.  Go see it.  If you won't do it for me, at least do it for Katie Holmes.
Title: Batman
Post by: LowCrawler on June 17, 2005, 08:54:30 AM
Quote
I daresay that it was super-good. 

The fights were good - cool and brawly rather than all kung fu, as Batman's ninja training would suggest it should be but I digress - there wasn't much buildup to the ending (I found myself, watching the final fight, a little surprised when I all of a sudden discovered that I was actually watching the final fight.)

Batman's voice is pretty lamesauce and a little overdone, and he has no cool catchphrases.  And in a relaistic setting his mask just looks silly (the rest of the costume was preeeetttty awesome)

Last, I would have preferred to see an R-rated movie, if for nothing else, for the sake of seeing Katie Holmes naked and maybe a bit more violence.



Overall, it's worth it.  Go see it.  If you won't do it for me, at least do it for Katie Holmes.
[snapback]51041[/snapback]


poor Katie Holmes...

"dont you think I sort of look like Natalie Portman?... Gee i sure wish i did :( I havent made a movie in like a bajillion years! Im a B LIST ACTRESS!!! And WHO IN THE HELL is this guy playing batman!??!"


but yeah. This movie was alot better than the Tim Burton ones. Less cartoonish (yes i know hes a cartoon character but you all know the difference) and more dark, brooding asskickery. And there was a preview for charlie and the chocolate factory... which i dearly hope is as good as the first one, which holds a place among LowCrawler's favorite movies ever... right up there with Die Hard and Black Hawk Down, for more recent movies.
Title: Batman
Post by: Malevolent on June 17, 2005, 11:55:54 AM
I think I'm gonna go with some people to see it next week, but it's pretty hard to wait.
Title: Batman
Post by: Manta on June 17, 2005, 08:08:50 PM
If anyone ruins the movie for me, I have sworn to avenge myself.

Anyway, I can see your complaint about Batman's "voice," but it's really just the actor. Then again, take a look at Hayden Christensen in Star Wars. Wooden.

And if you don't know who plays Batman, then you obviously haven't seen Equilibrium, which also had the honor of featuring the guy who played Trevelyan.
Title: Batman
Post by: Malevolent on June 17, 2005, 09:29:57 PM
Quote
If anyone ruins the movie for me, I have sworn to avenge myself.

Anyway, I can see your complaint about Batman's "voice," but it's really just the actor. Then again, take a look at Hayden Christensen in Star Wars. Wooden.

And if you don't know who plays Batman, then you obviously haven't seen Equilibrium, which also had the honor of featuring the guy who played Trevelyan.
[snapback]51075[/snapback]
Equilibrium kicks ass.
Title: Batman
Post by: bacon_flaps on June 17, 2005, 11:20:19 PM
Quote
My sister saw it in IMAX and said it was good... but my girlfriend absolutely hates Katie Holmes, so, I won't be seeing this one in theaters

 >_<  >_<  >_<
See it without her.
Title: Batman
Post by: Scuzball on June 18, 2005, 03:41:02 AM
I thought it was very well done. I loved Scarecrow!

I must admit I laughed pretty hard near the beggining. He's all "I will not kill this mudering farmer dude!"

Then he kills a dozen ninjas, his master, almost kills his 'friend,' and then to top it off. the farmer. I mean c'mon, the farmer gets blown up, burned, the building collapsed, and then he's shirtless and chained on top of the mountain.

I laughed at the double slap part too. Good ****!
Title: Batman
Post by: Manta on June 18, 2005, 09:08:50 AM
Quote
Quote
If anyone ruins the movie for me, I have sworn to avenge myself.

Anyway, I can see your complaint about Batman's "voice," but it's really just the actor. Then again, take a look at Hayden Christensen in Star Wars. Wooden.

And if you don't know who plays Batman, then you obviously haven't seen Equilibrium, which also had the honor of featuring the guy who played Trevelyan.
[snapback]51075[/snapback]
Equilibrium kicks ass.
[snapback]51083[/snapback]

QFT. Unfortunately, I couldn't help but laugh everytime they said "Grammaton."
Title: Batman
Post by: Wolfwood on June 18, 2005, 03:38:14 PM
Quote
Quote
My sister saw it in IMAX and said it was good... but my girlfriend absolutely hates Katie Holmes, so, I won't be seeing this one in theaters

 >_<  >_<  >_<
See it without her.
[snapback]51089[/snapback]

But that takes 90% of the fun out of it
Title: Batman
Post by: Ulatoh on June 18, 2005, 10:35:49 PM
... if seeing it without her takes 90% of the fun out of it, you're not watching the movie anyway?
Title: Batman
Post by: Jefe on June 18, 2005, 11:40:55 PM
This is how batman is supposed to be
Title: Batman
Post by: Wolfwood on June 19, 2005, 10:37:21 AM
Quote
... if seeing it without her takes 90% of the fun out of it, you're not watching the movie anyway?
[snapback]51131[/snapback]

::whistle::

 ;)
Title: Batman
Post by: Manta on June 19, 2005, 11:37:10 AM
Just saw it. I thought the whole movie was pretty good, and I really liked the beginning part with Ra's Al Ghul.

Just one thing, though: Dr. Crane looked girly, especially with his damn glasses.
Title: Batman
Post by: Diablus on June 19, 2005, 11:49:55 AM
I loved it. I like how it was more of a "dark" setting. The EXACT way the batman series should be.

If they do a sequel(s), they should just remake the other ones. It would so kick so much ass
Title: Batman
Post by: Ulatoh on June 24, 2005, 03:48:37 PM
yea i have to say it it was pretty awesome. I love the batman character and how it was portrayed in this film.

Film Noir is a rare art nowadays, it sorta peaked in the late 40's, save for a few rare pictures such as Mulholland Drive, Dark City, various hitchcock flicks like Vertigo, or Rear Window, and even though its a genre-crosser, the Matrix.

If you all like this sort of movie, you would really like films by an old director named Godard ( thats pronounced Go-dard) or Joseph H. Lewis, who made a movie called " Deadly is the lady" which was reshot as "Guncrazy."  Another good movie is called "Dementia," old, black and white, shot in 1955

I loved the movie's world. they created versimilitude and never did anything to make you snap of out that.  The only thing that i think they overlooked was that, if this microwave could fry water in steel pipes, those people shoulda been french-fried, seeing as how they arent shielded at all, and are made of water.
Title: Batman
Post by: Manta on June 24, 2005, 04:04:43 PM
Yeah, that was an oversight, but I think they made the rest of the movie so immersive that most people simply didn't notice.
Title: Batman
Post by: aeroripper on June 24, 2005, 06:36:12 PM
Yea there were a few plot holes... like in the beginning his parents getting shot by some bum but in the first batman it was the joker saying "hey kid, every dance with the devil on a pale moon night?"

but whatever it stills is the same general idea.  I also liked it how they kept it more "realistic" with the real looking city instead of the stylized tim burton world.

As soon as i saw him put on the mask and start scaring that guy i was like "hey i remember this guy! It's scarecrow!" (from the old batman cartoons)

*SPOILER*




Also i thought the new batmobile was friggen awesome.  I like it how they made it like a tank and did you see how thick those tires were!?!.  Yet it still has the fire hole in the back but whatever it still was cool.
Title: Batman
Post by: [JFF]Kirby on June 24, 2005, 09:44:40 PM
Quote
Quote
... if seeing it without her takes 90% of the fun out of it, you're not watching the movie anyway?
[snapback]51131[/snapback]

::whistle::

 ;)
[snapback]51144[/snapback]

pretty suck girlfriend to make movies 90% boring if you ask me
Title: Batman
Post by: Anarki3x6 on June 25, 2005, 12:10:13 AM
really nice movie, some weird parts in it o_o but it pretty much rocked..
his car is great but there needed to be more ass kicking!



and more katie holmes naked
>_>
<_<
Title: Batman
Post by: Manta on June 25, 2005, 08:15:12 AM
Haha. You just reminded me of Harold & Kumar.
Title: Batman
Post by: @gentOrange on June 25, 2005, 12:20:05 PM
Quote
Yea there were a few plot holes... like in the beginning his parents getting shot by some bum but in the first batman it was the joker saying "hey kid, every dance with the devil on a pale moon night?"

but whatever it stills is the same general idea.  I also liked it how they kept it more "realistic" with the real looking city instead of the stylized tim burton world.

As soon as i saw him put on the mask and start scaring that guy i was like "hey i remember this guy! It's scarecrow!" (from the old batman cartoons)

*SPOILER*




Also i thought the new batmobile was friggen awesome.  I like it how they made it like a tank and did you see how thick those tires were!?!.  Yet it still has the fire hole in the back but whatever it still was cool.
[snapback]51515[/snapback]

It was only the first movie that ever implied Joker was the gunman and it's not considered cannon. In the comics it WAS Chills who shot Bruce Wayne's parents.
Title: Batman
Post by: Ulatoh on June 26, 2005, 02:44:12 AM
Quote
Quote
Quote
... if seeing it without her takes 90% of the fun out of it, you're not watching the movie anyway?
[snapback]51131[/snapback]

::whistle::

 ;)
[snapback]51144[/snapback]

pretty suck girlfriend to make movies 90% boring if you ask me
[snapback]51516[/snapback]

you're missing the point...

if her not being there takes away 90% of the fun, it means you werent watching the movie, you were making out
Title: Batman
Post by: @gentOrange on June 26, 2005, 04:39:20 PM
Quote
Quote
Kirby,Jun 24 2005, 09:44 PM]
Quote
Quote
... if seeing it without her takes 90% of the fun out of it, you're not watching the movie anyway?
[snapback]51131[/snapback]

::whistle::

 ;)
[snapback]51144[/snapback]

pretty suck girlfriend to make movies 90% boring if you ask me
[snapback]51516[/snapback]

you're missing the point...

if her not being there takes away 90% of the fun, it means you werent watching the movie, you were making out
[snapback]51591[/snapback]

People still go to the theaters to make out? I'm pretty sure that's only done when you're a kid who's parents don't want you getting freaky.
Title: Batman
Post by: LowCrawler on June 26, 2005, 04:51:58 PM
thanks, ao... i was going to say

"when me and my girlfriend wanna make out she just comes over."
Title: Batman
Post by: Ulatoh on June 27, 2005, 11:18:56 AM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Kirby,Jun 24 2005, 09:44 PM]
Quote
Quote
... if seeing it without her takes 90% of the fun out of it, you're not watching the movie anyway?
[snapback]51131[/snapback]

::whistle::

 ;)
[snapback]51144[/snapback]

pretty suck girlfriend to make movies 90% boring if you ask me
[snapback]51516[/snapback]

you're missing the point...

if her not being there takes away 90% of the fun, it means you werent watching the movie, you were making out
[snapback]51591[/snapback]

People still go to the theaters to make out? I'm pretty sure that's only done when you're a kid who's parents don't want you getting freaky.
[snapback]51613[/snapback]

now ask yourself how old he is...
Title: Batman
Post by: Guenhwyvar on June 27, 2005, 02:25:30 PM
Lol.

Ok to bring this thread back on topic.  Caught it on a whim yesterday.  Just positively loved it. I have to say it was the best comic book adaptation I have seen to date.  Until this Batman movie, Spiderman was my favorite comic book adaptation movie.

There is just so much about this movie to enjoy.  Predictable, yeah, a few holes, yeah, but still it was awesome.  I almost did not see it because of Katie Holmes, but I am glad I saw it.  Wolfwood, you should tell your girlfriend to give it a try.  

Title: Batman
Post by: GoobTheNoob on June 30, 2005, 03:01:40 PM
Quote
My sister saw it in IMAX and said it was good... but my girlfriend absolutely hates Katie Holmes, so, I won't be seeing this one in theaters

 >_<  >_<  >_<
[snapback]51039[/snapback]

Katie Holmes hate is fine but don't miss this movie for that reason.  Hollywood has been force feeding us Katie-this and Katie-that due to the Tom Cruz Effect. She has been way over-billed for this movie.  She is not the star and she doesn't even get that much screen time.  It's all about Batman... go see it by yourself if your girlfriend won't go!
Title: Batman
Post by: Black Mage on July 02, 2005, 03:49:30 AM
i want his car
Title: Batman
Post by: Manta on July 02, 2005, 07:53:24 AM
Screw his car, I want his mansion and his cave.
Title: Batman
Post by: Ulatoh on July 04, 2005, 08:52:40 AM
dibs on his girlfriend
Title: Batman
Post by: LowCrawler on July 04, 2005, 11:03:48 AM
Quote
Quote
My sister saw it in IMAX and said it was good... but my girlfriend absolutely hates Katie Holmes, so, I won't be seeing this one in theaters

 >_<  >_<  >_<
[snapback]51039[/snapback]

Katie Holmes hate is fine but don't miss this movie for that reason.  Hollywood has been force feeding us Katie-this and Katie-that due to the Tom Cruz Effect. She has been way over-billed for this movie.  She is not the star and she doesn't even get that much screen time.  It's all about Batman... go see it by yourself if your girlfriend won't go!
[snapback]51740[/snapback]
perhaps not, but she is ONE of the stars, because her contribution to the plot is huge.
Title: Batman
Post by: SuicidaL MonkeY on July 04, 2005, 12:26:43 PM
SPOILER


My favorite part of this movie had to have been when he met Freeman down in that basement and got to meet a few toys and we got explanations!.....also how he made his first throwing bat knives. Overall great movie cept it cut near the end and we could only hear the sound :(
Title: Batman
Post by: rad4Christ on July 04, 2005, 02:28:23 PM
Ignoring the ignorance of LC's Tim Burton comic type movie comment (seeing as TB only did the first two, and they were VERY dark, it was Schumaker who ruined them), I agree with most of what's said. It was a great film, and the explanations were enough without being over the top (midichlorins anyone?). The tech was altered from prototypes, and the storyline was a bit predictable, but good. It evened opened the door to why the villians of Batman are a little over the top (gas plus gordon's assessment at the end).


Now, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and I'm happy.
Title: Batman
Post by: GoobTheNoob on July 06, 2005, 10:06:21 AM
Quote
perhaps not, but she is ONE of the stars, because her contribution to the plot is huge.
[snapback]51862[/snapback]


Hmm.  I'd say his father contributed more to the plot... and he was dead. :p
Title: Batman
Post by: Mr.Bill on July 11, 2005, 10:39:39 AM
gothem needed more goth.




And for the record, I saw batman twice with, and without my girlfriend. So piss off :-D

(She lives like 3 hours away! give me a break.)


But yeah it was a good movie. I would of liked more goth in gothem though, not nearly enough statues. BUT the train system seemed very true to the animated series :-D
Title: Batman
Post by: Niteowl on July 18, 2005, 12:11:53 PM
Awesome movie, Katie didn't suck nearly as much as I thought she would. The batmobile is all kinds of awesome.
Title: Batman
Post by: Diablus on July 18, 2005, 05:47:26 PM
Batmobile needed a Jetpack and dual weapon 3 HMG's with a flamethrower and siege cannon.
Title: Batman
Post by: Niteowl on July 19, 2005, 12:00:21 PM
Quote
Batmobile needed a Jetpack and dual weapon 3 HMG's with a flamethrower and siege cannon.
[snapback]52291[/snapback]
This isn't ns.org I&S :p :p

Apparently it could do a lot of the stuff you see int he movie, 0-60 in 7 seconds, 7 miles to the gallon :o, and do a non-ramped 40 foot jump.
Title: Batman
Post by: Manta on July 19, 2005, 02:00:07 PM
Quote
7 miles to the gallon :o
[snapback]52304[/snapback]

At that rate today, I doubt even Bruce Wayne could pay for all his gas.
Title: Batman
Post by: Goldy on July 23, 2005, 10:35:48 AM
I finally saw it, great story, but the fighting was horrible. They used that horrible technique of a shaky camera and lots of fast movements. No cohesiveness at all, you can't actually see what's going on. Aside from that it was fun, funny and cool. The bad guy was awesome.
Title: Batman
Post by: Rath on July 23, 2005, 12:25:32 PM
Quote
I finally saw it, great story, but the fighting was horrible. They used that horrible technique of a shaky camera and lots of fast movements. No cohesiveness at all, you can't actually see what's going on. Aside from that it was fun, funny and cool. The bad guy was awesome.
[snapback]52409[/snapback]


Yarrr I hate that type of fighting.  Both Bourne Supremacy and Chronicles of Riddick did it too.
Title: Batman
Post by: Manta on July 23, 2005, 02:49:54 PM
I'd say Batman's usage of it wasn't as bad as the others. Bourne had it the worst.
Title: Batman
Post by: Goldy on July 23, 2005, 07:23:04 PM
It makes you appreciate when you actually see the combat.. the best being, of course, Crouching Tiger!
Title: Batman
Post by: Niteowl on July 25, 2005, 11:44:19 AM
AUGH! Now I remember the ONE downside of the movie,the CRAPPY close camera fighting, ARGH!
Title: Batman
Post by: Zero7 on July 25, 2005, 11:48:58 AM
except Crouching Tiger was a disgrace to Chinese fighting, but hey, if you've never seen a Chinese fighting movie before, it must've seemed awesome. Granted Crouching Tiger did have it's moments, they weren't enough to warrant it as an "awesome" movie that won as many awards as it did. IMO, overrated movie that was way too hyped up.
Title: Batman
Post by: Malevolent on July 25, 2005, 12:03:26 PM
Quote
I'd say Batman's usage of it wasn't as bad as the others. Bourne had it the worst.
[snapback]52417[/snapback]
I hated The Bourne Supremacy mostly because of this. It was also a late show, and I didn't have much sleep....but I could still recognize ****ty cinematography.
Title: Batman
Post by: Goldy on July 26, 2005, 09:29:31 AM
Quote
except Crouching Tiger was a disgrace to Chinese fighting, but hey, if you've never seen a Chinese fighting movie before, it must've seemed awesome. Granted Crouching Tiger did have it's moments, they weren't enough to warrant it as an "awesome" movie that won as many awards as it did. IMO, overrated movie that was way too hyped up.
[snapback]52464[/snapback]
I was contrasting it with the shaky camera crap. But, who cares how it compares to "real" fighting or other movies that no one in the US has seen. It was a great movie.
Title: Batman
Post by: Niteowl on July 26, 2005, 10:37:10 AM
Quote
except Crouching Tiger was a disgrace to Chinese fighting, but hey, if you've never seen a Chinese fighting movie before, it must've seemed awesome. Granted Crouching Tiger did have it's moments, they weren't enough to warrant it as an "awesome" movie that won as many awards as it did. IMO, overrated movie that was way too hyped up.
[snapback]52464[/snapback]
I'm pretty sure Brazilian JuJitsu can disgrace Chinese Fighting all by itself as well :p  :ph34r:  XD
Title: Batman
Post by: Goldy on July 27, 2005, 07:13:10 AM
I'm happy in my ignorance, apparantly it allows me to enjoy more movies than you fighting people. :p Although, I have my own issues when tv/movies try to pull off computer stuff.. but it doesn't ruin my enjoyment, it just makes for a good laugh.

Anyway uhh.. Batman was good. Yeah, on topic.