Overly Chatty Penguins

The Ready Room => Off Topic => Topic started by: rad4Christ on December 21, 2004, 10:54:21 PM

Title: XXX Church
Post by: rad4Christ on December 21, 2004, 10:54:21 PM
A few months ago, I ran into a site that dealt specifically with pornography as an addiction, and checked it out, expecting it to be this churchy, smarmy, pray about it thing. What I found was a bit different.

At XXX Church (http://www.xxxchurch.com), you'll find everything from their motto, "Number 1 Christian Porn Site", to videos about Pete the Porno Puppet (http://www.jukeboxed.com/x3/pete30second.wmv), and how to Save The Kittens (http://www.jukeboxed.com/x3/kittens.wmv).

It has an accountability software you can download, places to talk to other ppl, all kinds of resources. I'm not trying to get a conversation started about the legitimacy of pornography, or any of that sort, but if you are struggling with it, I'd recommend checking it out. And if you don't really care about that stuff, check out the commercials and the Wally awards, they're a good laugh.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Asal on December 22, 2004, 01:27:59 AM
*chuckles* What I find is funny is the lack of replies to this, in any shape or form.  Maybe they dont find you interesting, Rad4.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Black Mage on December 22, 2004, 01:56:38 AM
everyone's too busy wanking/fapping to reply
Title: XXX Church
Post by: SwiftSpear on December 22, 2004, 03:51:19 AM
Interesting site...  You don't mind me linking the FHF forums do you?
Title: XXX Church
Post by: esuna on December 22, 2004, 03:59:52 AM
Urgh. It's funny how they're making money based on the things they stand against.

Masturbate too much? Buy a save the kittens t-shirt for $15!
Look at porn too much? Spend $975 for one person or $1,750 two people to get it sorted!

Excuse the blasphemy, but jesus :Ding christ. How can you charge someone $975 for a "porn addiction" (Something that isn't an addiction at all)?


Now throw in that the rest of the site is either them being arrogant or smarmy, throw in a few "WE KEEPIN' IT REAL FOR DA KIDZ" and all you have left is a pretty funny ironic website name.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: SwiftSpear on December 22, 2004, 04:10:53 AM
Quote
Urgh. It's funny how they're making money based on the things they stand against.

Masturbate too much? Buy a save the kittens t-shirt for $15!
Look at porn too much? Spend $975 for one person or $1,750 two people to get it sorted!

Excuse the blasphemy, but jesus :Ding christ. How can you charge someone $975 for a "porn addiction" (Something that isn't an addiction at all)?


Now throw in that the rest of the site is either them being arrogant or smarmy, throw in a few "WE KEEPIN' IT REAL FOR DA KIDZ" and all you have left is a pretty funny ironic website name.
[snapback]36964[/snapback]
Porn is definitely an addiction.  You try to just kind of never look at porn again!

I assume the costs are for some kind of counsoling, but I'll defininately give it too you that any costs seem kind of odd for a church site that is supposed to be trying to help people...  If I was qualified to counsul porn addicts I would be offering it for free, but unfortuneately you would be unable to find a less qualified person.  <_<
Title: XXX Church
Post by: rad4Christ on December 22, 2004, 07:53:48 AM
Quote
*chuckles* What I find is funny is the lack of replies to this, in any shape or form.  Maybe they dont find you interesting, Rad4.
[snapback]36957[/snapback]

I wasn't expecting people to say "OGM, thank you rad, I've been masturbating constantly for the alst 12 hours, and I want to stop." Pornography is a real issue that people face, and I thought I'd place a link for people to go to for information on ways to overcome. This is a personal issue with people, not one to discuss openly. Yet, it is a major problem among teenagers and young adults, and most people are afraid to address it. If there are 20 replies about how stupid it is, and how much of a ripoff it is, yet one person is helped by it without me even knowing, then it's worth it.

Quote
Urgh. It's funny how they're making money based on the things they stand against.
Masturbate too much? Buy a save the kittens t-shirt for $15! Look at porn too much? Spend $975 for one person or $1,750 two people to get it sorted!
Excuse the blasphemy, but jesus :Ding christ. How can you charge someone $975 for a "porn addiction" (Something that isn't an addiction at all)?
Now throw in that the rest of the site is either them being arrogant or smarmy, throw in a few "WE KEEPIN' IT REAL FOR DA KIDZ" and all you have left is a pretty funny ironic website name.
[snapback]36964[/snapback]
Granted, the counseling money is high, but some people are pretty bad off, and for some serious counseling by someone who "specializes" in dealing with the specific problem, it might be an average cost, I don't know. As for the tshirts and stuff, I think they're funny, and they get the message out to other people with a problem in a way that word of mouth never would.

As far as it being arrogant and smarmy, I think you're really missing the boat. If arrogance lies in the fact of their hate mail, or by their matter of fact writing, I'd say it's because thay want you know people are against it, in the religious community and the secular. THey're being hit on all sides, but they are following the path set before them. And let's face it, when you're dealing with a touchy issue such as pornography, there is no "light" way to deal with it. Yeah, they're out there, but they're trying to do something to help others, but all most people want to do is defensively tear it apart. Try looking past the cheezy commercials and odd catch phrases. There are prayer boards, where you can know that someone out there is specifically praying for you. And software where you can have someone else keep you accountable. Or just a good bit of information to help guide you to a place where you can overcome.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Legionnaired on December 22, 2004, 09:55:08 AM
1/2 of all divorces in the US involve pornography as one of the reasons, and 15% of porn users develop sexual disorders as a result of it. (Source. (http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:N5PgbR5k0lEJ:www.divorcewizards.com/divorcestats_porn.html+pornography+divorce+statistics&hl=en&client=firefox-a))

Harmless my foot.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: holy_devil on December 22, 2004, 10:52:00 AM
Quote
1/2 of all divorces in the US involve pornography as one of the reasons, and 15% of porn users develop sexual disorders as a result of it. (Source. (http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:N5PgbR5k0lEJ:www.divorcewizards.com/divorcestats_porn.html+pornography+divorce+statistics&hl=en&client=firefox-a))

Harmless my foot.
[snapback]36990[/snapback]

apples are harmless until you use them to attack people, candies are good until you choke on them(go lifesavers hole in center!) its all how you use the object/resource.. if you don't realize everything about porn before you watch it, and have full mental understanding of the difference between stage/dreaming/whatever and reality, then yes, it can be harmful to the person. you can't bash an idea entirely just because 15% of the people have a problem with it. we still sell cigaretts yet it kills how many people every year? at least porn doesn't kill people.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: sonic on December 22, 2004, 11:34:36 AM
Death by wanking....it COULD happen >.>
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Reasa on December 22, 2004, 11:47:52 AM
Pfft I'm more addicted to NS, where’s the website and expensive counseling for me!?
Title: XXX Church
Post by: GrayDuck on December 22, 2004, 12:04:51 PM
Quote
Pfft I'm more addicted to NS, where’s the website and expensive counseling for me!?
[snapback]36999[/snapback]
Isn't that what this, the NS forums and IRC are for?

My name is GrayDuck and I am addicted to NS.  Who wants to be my sponsor?

Back on topic:
Rad I haven't had time to dig into the site but I can't tell if it's meant to be taken seriously.  It just seems like a big joke or spoof.  But as I said I just watched the kitten video and looked at the front page.

Legionnaired, great find with the stats and stuff... I sent that link to my husband  :p I'm waiting to see his reaction.  haha

Edit:  He was offended  <_<
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Crispy on December 22, 2004, 12:06:35 PM
Quote
Death by while wanking....it COULD HAS happened >.>
[snapback]36998[/snapback]
In the UK there's a magazine called The Big Issue, sold by the homeless (with the person getting a reasonable percentage of the sale money). Anyway there used to be a section in the back of the mag devoted to funny death stories. Need I say more...
Title: XXX Church
Post by: rad4Christ on December 22, 2004, 12:48:14 PM
Quote
Rad I haven't had time to dig into the site but I can't tell if it's meant to be taken seriously.  It just seems like a big joke or spoof.  But as I said I just watched the kitten video and looked at the front page.
[snapback]37001[/snapback]

Go here: http://www.xxxchurch.com/porninc/story.asp (http://www.xxxchurch.com/porninc/story.asp)

Stories of people who have been helped. This is for real, under the marketing, eye catching devices is a true sentiment for helping others through this stuff.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Mr.Bill on December 22, 2004, 07:13:58 PM
In the defence of all abusers NOT wanting to reply to this

If we dont do porn, what will we do? there ARE worst things to be addicted to, arnt there?


THAT being said. I think I will need to go about and..... "self reform".

Let the insults begin!
Title: XXX Church
Post by: duherman on December 22, 2004, 11:39:01 PM
What the....
Title: XXX Church
Post by: EmperorPenguin on December 22, 2004, 11:46:17 PM
I salute you rad for having the courage to post this link.  These guys certainly have their own style, but I think the work is laudable.

Thanks Legion for finding the very stats I was thinking of, it can be serious stuff.  Not everyone who wanks off to hentai or whatever has a disorder, but it can become an addiction.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Asal on December 23, 2004, 02:07:41 AM
That's a point.  

I would have a hard time posting this, because to do so would say that you actually looked into it, that you were bothered by it, and that you were at least interested in it.  How many of you here are willing to say "I masturbate too much?"

Me, I used to masturbate.  It was the easist thing to stop, and on of the hardest to actually manage it.  And that's without anything else.  Those of you with pr0n, go ahead.  Me, I'll keep to my 'boring' life and keep out of it.

For some reason, it seems....wrong.

Edit: For the record, I'm agnostic.  No church was involved with my decision, nobody else knew.  So this isn't some fanatical religious crap for me.

Sidenote:  I hope Kodiac doesn't read this, how embarassing would that be?
Title: XXX Church
Post by: That Annoying Kid on December 23, 2004, 02:28:08 AM
hah, I don't even have to look at that site to know it's a joke

if your seriously addicted to porn, open your phonebook and find your local sexaholics anon chapter and get involved in a 12 step program and complete it.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: lolfighter on December 23, 2004, 08:57:57 AM
Quote
[...]Legionnaired, great find with the stats and stuff... I sent that link to my husband  :p I'm waiting to see his reaction.  haha

Edit:  He was offended  <_<
[snapback]37001[/snapback]
wth?
Title: XXX Church
Post by: GrayDuck on December 23, 2004, 01:21:28 PM
Quote
Quote
[...]Legionnaired, great find with the stats and stuff... I sent that link to my husband  :p I'm waiting to see his reaction.  haha

Edit:  He was offended  <_<
[snapback]37001[/snapback]
wth?
[snapback]37078[/snapback]

You tell me.  He thought I was making a threat or something.  He was very defensive about this issue.  I sent it to him because I found it interesting a bit humorous.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Nuketheplace on December 23, 2004, 02:34:20 PM
I can see how he might be offended.  If you send him that link it implies that you know he looks at porn.  Also it implies that you want him to stop because he is either A) Addicted or B) your going to brake up with him because he looks at it.   You might want to tell him that you found if funny.  That might make him feel better.

Edit: I had no clue that B) ment something in emoticons
Title: XXX Church
Post by: CForrester on December 25, 2004, 07:45:40 PM
Personally, I think that porn is only a problem because the society we live in MAKES it a problem. People who feel guilty for masturbating only feel guilty because they're TOLD to. From a young age, they're told that masturbating is an embarrassing subject and that it's wrong to do it.

I think that, if nobody were ever told that masturbation is wrong, that sex is embarrassing, and that porn is demeaning to women, we wouldn't be in this boat. People would masturbate because they want to. They would feel good about it. Porn would just be another kind of job, it wouldn't be any more embarrassing or strange than filing papers and answering telephones.

I'm not denying that it can be addictive, everything can be addictive. In fact, I'm willing to put money on the fact that there are more people addicted to caffeine than there are to masturbation. Caffeine is much more unhealthy than masturbation. Caffeine is also a drug. Why are some drugs okay and some aren't? Who the hell makes these laws? Caffeine, tobacco and alcohol are legal. These are things that your body can become addicted to. These are things that are much more harmful than pot, but pot is illegal. Your body also won't become addicted to pot. Any addiction to pot is mental.

In the end, I'm saying this: I masturbate. Often. It doesn't embarrass me to admit this. I enjoy it, it doesn't make me feel guilty. Yes, I fantasize about women. It doesn't bother me that these fantasies won't come true, they're fantasies. Not reality. It doesn't strain my relationship with women. (I actually get along better with women than I do with men. My best friend in the world is female. I do fantasize about her sometimes, but that doesn't make it any more difficult to be friends with her.) I also don't think that porn is demeaning to women. They wouldn't do it if they thought that it was robbing them of their dignity. (To be honest, I dislike "dignity". It only serves to make people feel bad. Look at dogs. Dogs don't have a sense of dignity. Neither do cats or any other non-human animal that I've ever seen. You won't ever see a monkey sulking because it hasn't got any clothes.)
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Mr.Bill on December 25, 2004, 08:32:58 PM
CForrester, A+ for you, That's something most of us here (I think ) can do. :-D


And for the record, the reason Pot is banned, is because you can actually make a real cheap paper from pot, REALLY easily, so they banned it so that companies can get a profit and make sure no one else can do it.


Other wise that whole "drug addiction" thing is a bonus they used to cover up.


God, I love history.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: lolfighter on December 26, 2004, 07:24:59 AM
Heck, I prefer porn stars to telemarketers. Porn stars don't call me at dinnertime trying to hawk their wares.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: LowCrawler on December 26, 2004, 10:46:34 AM
Quote
Quote
Quote
[...]Legionnaired, great find with the stats and stuff... I sent that link to my husband  :p I'm waiting to see his reaction.  haha

Edit:  He was offended  <_<
[snapback]37001[/snapback]
wth?
[snapback]37078[/snapback]

You tell me.  He thought I was making a threat or something.  He was very defensive about this issue.  I sent it to him because I found it interesting a bit humorous.
[snapback]37098[/snapback]

sounds like you should dump the guy, and run off with someone much younger who drives a 1991 buick regal and lives in central texas... I hear good things about those boys.


 :p
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Clashen on December 26, 2004, 11:12:32 AM
I just do it to keep my prostate healthy, i don't enjoy it.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: SwiftSpear on December 27, 2004, 04:28:19 AM
Quote
Personally, I think that porn is only a problem because the society we live in MAKES it a problem. People who feel guilty for masturbating only feel guilty because they're TOLD to. From a young age, they're told that masturbating is an embarrassing subject and that it's wrong to do it.
For the most part a agree with you here.  But the fact must be recognized that it is sometimes destructive, and there is nothing wrong with a person who chooses not to masturbate for whatever reason.  I also want to draw out the fact that masturbation and porn are not nessicarily synonamous, and the problems with one are not the problems of the other.

Quote
I think that, if nobody were ever told that masturbation is wrong, that sex is embarrassing, and that porn is demeaning to women, we wouldn't be in this boat. People would masturbate because they want to. They would feel good about it. Porn would just be another kind of job, it wouldn't be any more embarrassing or strange than filing papers and answering telephones.
I can't help but disagree compleatly here.  Perhaps if no one had been told such things the world would be a different place, but that is essentially the same argument that the nazis made as they eliminated the jews: if the jews never existed the world would be a better place (sorry, the comparison to nazis was not meant to be personal, I assure you I hold your views in MUCH MUCH less contempt then I hold the view the nazi's had).  Such speculation is problematic because it basicly eliminates the freedom of humanity in the world.  Sure a world with only one type of person would be more peaceful, but it's also really irrealistic to wish for and ultimately an affront to humanity.

I really don't think that the argument is even fair anyways.  Pornography IS demening to woman, and generally a terrible force towards objectifying them as a sex objects.  I feel no regret in saying that it is alot harder to think of a woman with the respect she rightfully deserves as a human being if you are excessively preocupied with her sexually.  Speaking from my own experiance, the less I have been viewing pornography recently the easier it is to keep my mind where it should be when interacting with females.  The objectifing of women in general is something that I personally find quite problematic in today's society, and something that I avoid at all costs in my own life.

Quote
I'm not denying that it can be addictive, everything can be addictive. In fact, I'm willing to put money on the fact that there are more people addicted to caffeine than there are to masturbation. Caffeine is much more unhealthy than masturbation. Caffeine is also a drug. Why are some drugs okay and some aren't? Who the hell makes these laws? Caffeine, tobacco and alcohol are legal. These are things that your body can become addicted to. These are things that are much more harmful than pot, but pot is illegal. Your body also won't become addicted to pot. Any addiction to pot is mental.
Being addictive is less of a problem with pornography than being destructive is.  The fact that it is addictive only means that there is bound to be addicts that began early in life that end up stuck in there ways even after they disagree with the messages being portrayed and are frustrated with the consequences of addiction in there life.  If coffee addiction was more distructive to a persons life you can bet there would be much more of a movement to help addicts recover.  Being addiction is rarely a reason to combat addiction in and of itself, thus there is more to the issue than seems to be apparent on surface level.

Quote
In the end, I'm saying this: I masturbate. Often. It doesn't embarrass me to admit this. I enjoy it, it doesn't make me feel guilty. Yes, I fantasize about women. It doesn't bother me that these fantasies won't come true, they're fantasies. Not reality. It doesn't strain my relationship with women. (I actually get along better with women than I do with men. My best friend in the world is female. I do fantasize about her sometimes, but that doesn't make it any more difficult to be friends with her.) I also don't think that porn is demeaning to women. They wouldn't do it if they thought that it was robbing them of their dignity. (To be honest, I dislike "dignity". It only serves to make people feel bad. Look at dogs. Dogs don't have a sense of dignity. Neither do cats or any other non-human animal that I've ever seen. You won't ever see a monkey sulking because it hasn't got any clothes.)
If your friend doesn't find you fanticizing about her insulting, then good for you.  I honesly don't disagree with anything you say to that point.  Dignity however, may seem a trivial concept, but it really isn't.  The beheivior of animals is a poor gage of the apropriateness of human beheivior.  We construct our social structures compleatly differently then any known living species and we do this because our brains are structured with a compleatly different set of psycological phenomena then any other being in the animal kingdom.  The information that any given animal is able to conceptualize is FAR FAR below that of even a substandard human being; not to say that they aren't capable of learning or forming an understanding of thier environment, but they aren't capable of abstract thought, or with the exception of a few examples, layered learning connections.  Some beheivioral patterns may trancend the man/beast barrier, but those must be taken as the exeption not the rule.

In our case our ability to form judgements about a person and hold grudges based on thier behaviors must be taken into account, and some concept of dignity must be formed.  The nature or application of dignity I certainly consider up for debate... It is one of humanities catch words like 'honor' or 'love' in so that it really does not have an adequate in depth definition to speak of.  I can say this much about the issue however, if I were to ever meet one of the women that I recognized from something pornographic, it would be very hard for me to assess her without a-friggin-lot of preconceptions that she may or may not deserve.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: sonic on December 27, 2004, 06:50:16 AM
When I saw Swiftspear had made a post in this thread, I thought "uh oh, here comes a 50 million page essay about how porn = bad and masturbating = bad" and guess what? I was bloody right.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Dirty Harry Potter on December 27, 2004, 09:13:31 AM
actually, he didn't quite say that. He said that masburbation is not the same as pornography, and that pornography is bad.

Back on topic. About women being treated as sex objects through porn, yes i guess they do, however, just because you treat one woman as a sex object at some point, doesn't mean you treat every women as such, nor does it mean you treat the woman as a sex object all the time. If watching porno indeed does make you treat women as sex objects would depend on the person watching the porn.

Generally i'd say that pornography would just make you more inclined to notice the sexual side of females, i hardly think pornography would make people treat women as objects. Futhermore, Sexuality isn't really the same as objectification, if it was, then you wouldn't be able to have sex without being a degrading asshole.

About sexuality and women, if this is bad or not depends on the woman in question. Some might find it offending, others might not. A rule of thumb would be that if they think you as a sexual being, then they don't mind you thinking openly(that is, you tell her or she discovers it) of them as a sexual being. If they mind you doing it secretly, well.....there's a saying that goes: "what they don't know, can't hurt them". The real question is how much it annoys the observer of the women, and this is where or differences come in.


How you think pornography is destructive i can't quite see, do you mean the potential degrading of women connected to it, or something else ?
Title: XXX Church
Post by: CForrester on December 27, 2004, 10:38:31 AM
Quote
Quote
Personally, I think that porn is only a problem because the society we live in MAKES it a problem. People who feel guilty for masturbating only feel guilty because they're TOLD to. From a young age, they're told that masturbating is an embarrassing subject and that it's wrong to do it.
For the most part a agree with you here.  But the fact must be recognized that it is sometimes destructive, and there is nothing wrong with a person who chooses not to masturbate for whatever reason.  I also want to draw out the fact that masturbation and porn are not nessicarily synonamous, and the problems with one are not the problems of the other.
Oh, I don't mean to say that there's anything wrong with someone who chooses not to masturbate. In fact, masturbation seems to be unnatural, itself. Masturbation is probably against natural instinct, in that the object is procreation, not recreation. It doesn't hurt me, however, and I enjoy it. So it doesn't bother me.

Quote
Quote
I think that, if nobody were ever told that masturbation is wrong, that sex is embarrassing, and that porn is demeaning to women, we wouldn't be in this boat. People would masturbate because they want to. They would feel good about it. Porn would just be another kind of job, it wouldn't be any more embarrassing or strange than filing papers and answering telephones.
I can't help but disagree compleatly here.  Perhaps if no one had been told such things the world would be a different place, but that is essentially the same argument that the nazis made as they eliminated the jews: if the jews never existed the world would be a better place (sorry, the comparison to nazis was not meant to be personal, I assure you I hold your views in MUCH MUCH less contempt then I hold the view the nazi's had).  Such speculation is problematic because it basicly eliminates the freedom of humanity in the world.  Sure a world with only one type of person would be more peaceful, but it's also really irrealistic to wish for and ultimately an affront to humanity.
We wouldn't know until we've seen it played out, though. For all we know, maybe the world WOULD have been a better place if the Jews never existed. (I'm not saying that this is my view and I don't agree with eliminating the Jews now.) On the other hand, it could be even worse. We wouldn't know unless it actually played out that way.

I didn't really mean that everyone would be the same. I meant more... The scales would be tipped more towards people not being embarrassed about it. As it stands, a good majority of the population is embarrassed when it comes to discussing sex.

Quote
I really don't think that the argument is even fair anyways.  Pornography IS demening to woman, and generally a terrible force towards objectifying them as a sex objects.  I feel no regret in saying that it is alot harder to think of a woman with the respect she rightfully deserves as a human being if you are excessively preocupied with her sexually.  Speaking from my own experiance, the less I have been viewing pornography recently the easier it is to keep my mind where it should be when interacting with females.  The objectifing of women in general is something that I personally find quite problematic in today's society, and something that I avoid at all costs in my own life.
How is it any different from watching a violent movie or playing a video game? It's still fantasy, just a different sort of fantasy. People need to keep the difference between fantasy and reality obvious.

This may be a place where we're quite different. I don't have problems with objectifying women. I keep the differences between fantasy and reality in mind. Even in my fantasies, I don't consider women to be objects. Even in porn, I don't consider them to be objects. I know and always remember that women have thoughts, feelings, opinions, rights, etc... But I don't let that stop me from occasionally thinking about some of them sexually. (Not all of them. An example being one of my friends. It bothers me to think about her sexually. I don't consider her to be the kind of person that should be thought of in that way.)

Quote
Quote
I'm not denying that it can be addictive, everything can be addictive. In fact, I'm willing to put money on the fact that there are more people addicted to caffeine than there are to masturbation. Caffeine is much more unhealthy than masturbation. Caffeine is also a drug. Why are some drugs okay and some aren't? Who the hell makes these laws? Caffeine, tobacco and alcohol are legal. These are things that your body can become addicted to. These are things that are much more harmful than pot, but pot is illegal. Your body also won't become addicted to pot. Any addiction to pot is mental.
Being addictive is less of a problem with pornography than being destructive is.  The fact that it is addictive only means that there is bound to be addicts that began early in life that end up stuck in there ways even after they disagree with the messages being portrayed and are frustrated with the consequences of addiction in there life.  If coffee addiction was more distructive to a persons life you can bet there would be much more of a movement to help addicts recover.  Being addiction is rarely a reason to combat addiction in and of itself, thus there is more to the issue than seems to be apparent on surface level.
Caffeine is very destructive, though. It's a little difficult to notice because it's so incredibly widespread, moreso than porn, and nearly constantly being consumed. For example: People get so addicted to caffeine that, if they can't have their coffee in the morning, they feel drowsy all day. They're irritable, on-edge and depressed. Caffeine becomes a part of their life. I'm not entirely sure, but I believe that caffeine is physically addictive as well as mentally addictive. (Porn isn't physically addictive.) Read this (http://home.howstuffworks.com/caffeine3.htm) for information on how caffeine works.

I think a movement to help caffeine addicts doesn't exist (or exists and is very small) because of the fact that caffeine has become so integrated in to peoples' lives that it's incredibly difficult to remove and most people just plain don't care. More people care about porn addiction because the Church opposes porn and masturbation and so many people have been brought up to think that porn is wrong. (But not caffeine.)

So it's not necessarily because porn is a bigger problem, it's just getting more publicity.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: JohnTheGarbageman on December 27, 2004, 10:54:50 AM
I like how we just equated "wanting to hump" to "objectification". If you're unable to have sex without demeaning your partner into an object, I feel a tad sorry for you.

Quote
I can't help but disagree compleatly here. Perhaps if no one had been told such things the world would be a different place, but that is essentially the same argument that the nazis made as they eliminated the jews: if the jews never existed the world would be a better place

Wow, I hope to god you're just trolling for kicks. Otherwise that is not just the tiredest, most klicheed analogy, its also worthlessly inaccurate in this case. Saying "If we didn't believe it to be bad, we wouldn't have this problem" does not equate to saying "If these people didn't exist, we wouldn't have this problem". One deals with a simple mindset and social stigmata, the other with human beings that have done nothing except be at the receiving end of negative prejudice.

If anything, the corresponding argument would be : The Nazis would have had a much easier life if they'd just believed Jews, gays, tramps, the poor and crippled are cool, since it wouldn't have hurt them one bit. Unsurprisingly enough, that rings fairly true - without that whole psychopathic genocide bit Hitler might have been a reasonable chap. But I wouldn't advocate going along with this any further, I have no intent of equating your reasons for disliking pornography with racial hatred.


Now, back on topic. The whole issue of demeaning and mistreatment is a simple one - if you care, fight the real issue and not pornography. Yes, mistreatment at the workplace is a social malady - it happens in many, many places though, and not just when a penis and a vagina are involved. I'm all for more humane working conditions across the board - but porn isn't the right scapegoat.

Definitely the most opportune though, as you've so cleverly demonstrated several times - our own phantasys make it very easy to imagine pornography as universally demeaning and unfair, and with the good old socially fueled repression going on, finding a good reason to point at porn and say "Hey, I'm against this" is perfect.

If you really care about the issue of personal and sexual abuse, then go do something about it, and not obscure your goal with a crusade against porn. And if you just want to crusade against porn - well, go meditate or something. You're too tense.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Evangelion_2 on December 27, 2004, 02:53:45 PM
must....type...with...one....hand...
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Black Mage on December 27, 2004, 03:27:23 PM
Quote
must....type...with...one....hand...
[snapback]37359[/snapback]
aaaannnnnd we have a winner!
Title: XXX Church
Post by: SwiftSpear on December 27, 2004, 06:38:41 PM
Everyone's attacking me :(

In all seriousness though, all I'm saying is that it is unrealistic to expect the anti-pornographic movement to just go away, and I personally think that it isn't nessicarily a bad thing.  You can argue that the 50% of marriages that collapse with pornography being a factor is simply due to people who ignorantly belive that pornography is just inately bad, but I think that is ignoring the fact that there is alot about human sexuality that we still don't understand, and there is alot of emotional attachements and structures that humans, as sexual beings, still have not mapped out.

I was never arguing that sex without objectification is not possible, but the vast majority of pornography is far more objectification than it is sex.  Does that make all pornography wrong? I don't know.  But I haven't been impressed with what I have seen so far.

Dignity still IS an issue to be considered.  The vast magority of women simply don't want to be thought of in any way that might be synonomous with porn stars.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: LowCrawler on December 27, 2004, 09:53:38 PM
consider this:

who taught you to whack off? I know i was trying to flub mine before i had ever even seen a boobie....

its builtin, like picking your nose, and theres nothing wrong with it.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: SwiftSpear on December 28, 2004, 01:39:56 AM
Quote
consider this:

who taught you to whack off? I know i was trying to flub mine before i had ever even seen a boobie....

its builtin, like picking your nose, and theres nothing wrong with it.
[snapback]37372[/snapback]
It's a little different... But never the less, I don't see how it really hurts anyone.  I don't see how a simple personal action that involves absolutly no one else can really be all to problematic.

Some might argue that it prevokes inapropriate fantasies, but if you are too incapable to control the creations of your own mind you should be seeking psychological help anyways.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: sonic on December 28, 2004, 04:05:50 AM
Watch out LowCrawler, those fantasies in your head might escape through your ear and mug an old lady. Best see professional help before the worst happens!
Title: XXX Church
Post by: lolfighter on December 28, 2004, 07:06:31 AM
Quote
Quote
must....type...with...one....hand...
[snapback]37359[/snapback]
aaaannnnnd we have a winner!
[snapback]37360[/snapback]
Now I know why confused's spelling is so... confused. :D
Title: XXX Church
Post by: JohnTheGarbageman on December 28, 2004, 10:24:05 PM
@scooter:
Welcome to the "I don't need an argument if I have controversy" argumentation style ;)

And just because I never replied to it, the "15% of all people viewing pornography develope sexual disorders" statistic took the cake. I'd like to see how that survey was done with a correct control group - fine 2 similiar numbers of people who do and don't view any porn at all, prove that none of them currently have any sexual disorders, then go on and study them over 30 years. When you're done be quoted by a fluff site that conveniently emits any information about what definitions for SDs were used (DSM-IV? ), and what methods were used for the survey, and what rate of disorder developement was found amongst real "non porners". Phew. Suffice to say that site does not appear credible in the slightest.

Quote
Dignity still IS an issue to be considered.  The vast magority of women simply don't want to be thought of in any way that might be synonomous with porn stars.
[snapback]37369[/snapback]

The vast majority of men don't want to be the one-dimensional character of a romance novel, the tired stereotype of a soap-operate antagonist or for that matter, most poignantly, a well-toned, tanned meathead fresh out of any commercial. That does not mean I, as a guy, find it wrong that some females entertain these fantasies - and I'm certain not every female that has once bought into one of these things would be capable of only this kind of thought.

In the same way, we all know not all women are large breasted bleached blondes ready to :D the nearest stranger, but sometimes we just want to relax and pretend. Simplified and rather demeaning stereotypes are the lifebread of all sorts of entertainment anyways - literature, video, film, books - and not exclusive to porno.

So excuse me if I still don't see the compelling reason behind this anti-pornography thing. Of course you are right, its not doing a whole lot of harm either - but I got the feeling you wanted to discuss the benefits here, not make the statement that repressive attitudes towards sexuality are "still better than a poke in the eye". :p


Addendum :
You're correct that the human psyche, and not just sexuality, as a whole is a largely vague field - however that disorders are often created by repression or the creation of subconscious and conscious conflicts is no secret.

Oh well, 7 AM and I'm not being very coherent. If anything above seems unclear, just ask.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: LowCrawler on December 29, 2004, 10:11:37 AM
WHO CARES

about dignity of pornstars!???!?!?!


about phycological disorders?!??!


damnit i need some porn....never had to whack one out this bad in my LIFE
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Mr.Bill on December 29, 2004, 12:08:25 PM
Lowcrawler, Im pretty sure I speak for all of us when I say,


I could of live a longer, and much happier life... Without knowing that.

:-D
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Malevolent on December 29, 2004, 01:37:34 PM
I agree with Mr.Bill on that one.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: That Annoying Kid on December 29, 2004, 02:12:27 PM
Quote
CForrester, A+ for you, That's something most of us here (I think ) can do. :-D


And for the record, the reason Pot is banned, is because you can actually make a real cheap paper from pot, REALLY easily, so they banned it so that companies can get a profit and make sure no one else can do it.


Other wise that whole "drug addiction" thing is a bonus they used to cover up.


God, I love history.
[snapback]37249[/snapback]

sactly, Forrester hit the nail on the head. Take any 16 + male and ask them if they masturabate on a regular basis, if they say no they are lying. Adam Carolla said it in a very interesting way: If you leave me alone with myself for more than 30 minutes, the odds are very good that I will beat off. The part that I found amusing was how Dr. Drew immediatly commented on what that says about Adam :p

Mr. Bill even though it's O/T, if you replaced marijuana with the tobacco that was grown in the 13 colonies I would bet MUGA that dojer would be legal in this day and age, and everyone all would hide in alleys and dark spots and smoke tobacco .


and dignity of porn stars....  o_O  v_v

all I'm going to say is that chances are the actors made a concious chose for themselves to be in the "films" so it's a moot point
Title: XXX Church
Post by: JohnTheGarbageman on December 29, 2004, 03:34:21 PM
THC is a hallucinogen, nicotine is a stimulant. I doubt people would be getting their soft stimulant fix from tobacco, its just not quite as interesting as marijuana. Or can you imagine someone saying "Hey, you've got to try it - you'll feel slightly energized and fidgety, like having a coffee" ? :p

Not that I personally care a whole lot, if we were going to devolve down the legalisation road I'd have to agree that adverse health effects aren't strong enough in marijuana to warrant disallowing consumation and posession.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: LowCrawler on December 29, 2004, 03:46:31 PM
Quote
Lowcrawler, Im pretty sure I speak for all of us when I say,


I could of live a longer, and much happier life... Without knowing that.

:-D
[snapback]37464[/snapback]

teehee.. i killed a kitten!

which is ok because im DEATHLY allergic to cats.

cats=bane of my exsitence
Title: XXX Church
Post by: That Annoying Kid on December 29, 2004, 03:50:41 PM
I sense an interesting and enlightening discussion here, illicit substances are a multi billion dollar industry that could be easily capitalized upon, taxed, regulated, etc. Not to mention it would be much easier to address problems of abuse and treatment. Picture a world where you want to smoke a little bombski but can still be a productive active member of society, get good grades, pay taxes, etc then go right ahead. You had a hard day at the office and want some affect regulation with that yowder? take a line or two but if you get out of hand here is all the local places to help deal with your problem.

if other peeps are down for some discussion forums status talk on this subject just say so and we can have TLM == NSF discussion forum part deuce

but this is a thread about porno and becoming free from it so I'm not going to hijack any more

[edit]
removed the ^^ cause LC snuck a post in before me
[/edit]
Title: XXX Church
Post by: CForrester on December 29, 2004, 06:46:37 PM
Quote
THC is a hallucinogen
[snapback]37482[/snapback]
Actually, it doesn't really fit in to any category.

Quote
Cannabis is unusual in that it produces effects similar to those of many different psychoactive substances. The drug does not easily slot into any of the normal psychoactive groups (depressants, stimulants, hallucinogens) and displays characteristics distinctive to all three. A group of people using cannabis may swing from introspective states of dreamy detachment to high-energy conversation and collective euphoria.

By the way, catnip is a hallucinogen if smoked. Catnip tea is a relaxant. (I have catnip tea sometimes. It's very nice, but some people might find it to be too bitter.) I haven't smoked it yet, though.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Dubbilex on December 29, 2004, 07:00:14 PM
Quote
Caffeine is very destructive, though. It's a little difficult to notice because it's so incredibly widespread, moreso than porn, and nearly constantly being consumed. For example: People get so addicted to caffeine that, if they can't have their coffee in the morning, they feel drowsy all day. They're irritable, on-edge and depressed. Caffeine becomes a part of their life. I'm not entirely sure, but I believe that caffeine is physically addictive as well as mentally addictive. (Porn isn't physically addictive.) Read this for information on how caffeine works.

I think a movement to help caffeine addicts doesn't exist (or exists and is very small) because of the fact that caffeine has become so integrated in to peoples' lives that it's incredibly difficult to remove and most people just plain don't care. More people care about porn addiction because the Church opposes porn and masturbation and so many people have been brought up to think that porn is wrong. (But not caffeine.)

So it's not necessarily because porn is a bigger problem, it's just getting more publicity.

Caffeine has been proven to help prevent diabetes.  DOES PORN PREVENT DIABETES?
Title: XXX Church
Post by: 2_of_8 on December 29, 2004, 07:16:41 PM
Quote
Caffeine has been proven to help prevent diabetes.  DOES PORN PREVENT DIABETES?
[snapback]37493[/snapback]
I, along with many others, sure hope it does.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: CForrester on December 29, 2004, 10:12:58 PM
Quote
Quote
Caffeine is very destructive, though. It's a little difficult to notice because it's so incredibly widespread, moreso than porn, and nearly constantly being consumed. For example: People get so addicted to caffeine that, if they can't have their coffee in the morning, they feel drowsy all day. They're irritable, on-edge and depressed. Caffeine becomes a part of their life. I'm not entirely sure, but I believe that caffeine is physically addictive as well as mentally addictive. (Porn isn't physically addictive.) Read this for information on how caffeine works.

I think a movement to help caffeine addicts doesn't exist (or exists and is very small) because of the fact that caffeine has become so integrated in to peoples' lives that it's incredibly difficult to remove and most people just plain don't care. More people care about porn addiction because the Church opposes porn and masturbation and so many people have been brought up to think that porn is wrong. (But not caffeine.)

So it's not necessarily because porn is a bigger problem, it's just getting more publicity.

Caffeine has been proven to help prevent diabetes.  DOES PORN PREVENT DIABETES?
[snapback]37493[/snapback]
No, but it helps prevent prostate cancer. :p
Title: XXX Church
Post by: SwiftSpear on December 30, 2004, 01:57:30 AM
Quote
No, but it helps prevent prostate cancer. :p
[snapback]37503[/snapback]
I don't know about you, but I can masturbate without porn just fine.

Compare the pro's and con's of porn with the pro's and con's of violent media if you must, but don't go telling me about the medical benifits of porn.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Black Mage on December 30, 2004, 02:50:58 AM
Quote
Quote
No, but it helps prevent prostate cancer. :p
[snapback]37503[/snapback]
I don't know about you, but I can masturbate without porn just fine.

Compare the pro's and con's of porn with the pro's and con's of violent media if you must, but don't go telling me about the medical benifits of porn.
[snapback]37512[/snapback]

actually, looking at porn has been proven to increase your heart rate enough that it can almost count as cardiovascular exercise. about 30 minutes per day can increase your ALE by 2-10 years.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: SwiftSpear on December 30, 2004, 05:07:10 AM
Quote
Quote
Quote
No, but it helps prevent prostate cancer. :p
[snapback]37503[/snapback]
I don't know about you, but I can masturbate without porn just fine.

Compare the pro's and con's of porn with the pro's and con's of violent media if you must, but don't go telling me about the medical benifits of porn.
[snapback]37512[/snapback]

actually, looking at porn has been proven to increase your heart rate enough that it can almost count as cardiovascular exercise. about 30 minutes per day can increase your ALE by 2-10 years.
[snapback]37519[/snapback]
Wasn't that on ebaums world?

God forbid you do something strenuous like walking up a flight of stairs as an alternitive...
Title: XXX Church
Post by: sonic on December 30, 2004, 07:20:30 AM
So the next time I feel the need to masturbate, i'll just walk up some stairs, thanks swift!
Title: XXX Church
Post by: lolfighter on December 30, 2004, 07:50:29 AM
Quote
actually, looking at porn has been proven to increase your heart rate enough that it can almost count as cardiovascular exercise. about 30 minutes per day can increase your ALE by 2-10 years.
[snapback]37519[/snapback]
Brainiac, (http://www.skyone.co.uk/programmes/brainiac/) though, put this to the test, and found it not to be true. While looking at porn WILL increase your heart rate, it cannot measure up to genuine exercise. Sorry guys.

In fact, pretty much EVERY attempt to find a replacement for exercise has failed. It's amazing how much effort people will use on trying to be lazy. ;)

Suggested sports are rowing, swimming and skiing. I'd vote for rowing, as it includes social life too.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Dubbilex on December 30, 2004, 09:16:53 AM
Quote
Quote
actually, looking at porn has been proven to increase your heart rate enough that it can almost count as cardiovascular exercise. about 30 minutes per day can increase your ALE by 2-10 years.
[snapback]37519[/snapback]
Brainiac, (http://www.skyone.co.uk/programmes/brainiac/) though, put this to the test, and found it not to be true. While looking at porn WILL increase your heart rate, it cannot measure up to genuine exercise. Sorry guys.

In fact, pretty much EVERY attempt to find a replacement for exercise has failed. It's amazing how much effort people will use on trying to be lazy. ;)

Suggested sports are rowing, swimming and skiing. I'd vote for rowing, as it includes social life too.
[snapback]37531[/snapback]

Surely, you jest!  Geeks will work 'till the end of time to find a replacement for excercise that's both easier and more hedonistic.  It's already been written.
Title: XXX Church
Post by: Mr.Bill on December 30, 2004, 03:59:38 PM
Heres an idea


Get 2 spare computer cases, mod then to have a bar connecting the two (reinforce if needed) and use those to do weights

Once your good with those, start adding old harddrives, and heatsinks. Bam, Your keeping fit, AND staying nerd.



But people! really! weed was banned because of the paper industry!

Title: XXX Church
Post by: JohnTheGarbageman on January 01, 2005, 02:53:01 PM
Quote
Quote
THC is a hallucinogen
[snapback]37482[/snapback]
Actually, it doesn't really fit in to any category.

Sorry for being simplistic about the matter, however a fair sum of substances don't smoothly fit a single of the 3 basic categorys. Thats why they're called basic categorys. The borders are just as wishy-washy with MDMA (ecstasy), which is also either described as hallucinogen/stimulant or more fittingly as "something entirely else".

Its my understanding we were discussing the effects of the commonly consumed varietys. Either way though, you're completely right :)



Edit : Even alcohol is funny. The biggest, most common party drug around, yet its a depressant ;)
Title: XXX Church
Post by: SwiftSpear on January 01, 2005, 05:35:22 PM
Quote
Quote
Quote
THC is a hallucinogen
[snapback]37482[/snapback]
Actually, it doesn't really fit in to any category.

Sorry for being simplistic about the matter, however a fair sum of substances don't smoothly fit a single of the 3 basic categorys. Thats why they're called basic categorys. The borders are just as wishy-washy with MDMA (ecstasy), which is also either described as hallucinogen/stimulant or more fittingly as "something entirely else".

Its my understanding we were discussing the effects of the commonly consumed varietys. Either way though, you're completely right :)



Edit : Even alcohol is funny. The biggest, most common party drug around, yet its a depressant ;)
[snapback]37666[/snapback]
Most drugs have some sort of primary function, and on TOP of that function they fit into one of the three catagories...  It gets complicated when the primary function and the general catagory conflict with eachother, but they usually are still knowticable... The intended effect being distinct from the secondary side effects.